Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Camera recomendation
#1

1) Casual user You use the camera to photograph family events and vacations and occasionally something that happens to catch your attention on your way to work. You do not process photos much in software. Most of the time, you post your photos on social networks or send photos to your friends by E-mail. Some photos you print as 4"x5" (10 cm x 13 cm or similar).

Stay with cell phone. These days, cell phones can take great photos and there are many apps that allow you to process them quickly and easily and to send them to Facebook and other sites. The phone makes pretty smart decisions for you, it is light and you always have the camera with you - a great advantage. The compact cameras do not offer enough advantage for your use to justify the (admittedly low) cost. Remember that you use the camera relatively infrequently and the advances in the camera field are still quite fast. Your expense will need to be amortized over one or few years, as better cameras are just around the corner. Stay with the cell phone.

2) Hobbyist. You continue to take casual photos sometimes, but you also wish to take photos as a means of artistic self-expression. You know about aperture, shutter speed, ISO, depth of field and focal length. May be you use RAW file format and do some post-processing.

Consider getting a micro4/3 camera from Panasonic or Olympus. There is a large selection at all price points and new cameras are rolling in all the time. The micro 4/3 has become a de facto a standard format and virtually all independent lens makers support it (supporting companies: Olympus, Panasonic, Cosina/Voigtlander, Carl Zeiss AG, Jos. Schneider Optische Werke GmbH, Komamura Corporation, Sigma Corporation, Tamron, Astrodesign and Yasuhara). The lens list is comprehensive (including everything from shift lens and fisheyes to telephotos and zooms). The only thing I found missing is long telephoto primes. Many of the lenses are superb and much cheaper than comparable DSLR lenses and they way about a third of DSLR lenses). The most recent sensors from Olympus and Panasonic are very good and I do not think that there is enough advantage in a slightly larger APS-C sensor built into a much bulkier into level DSLRs with much bulkier and generally much more costly DSLR lenses. The other competition is primarily held back by high cost and paucity of lens choices. If you buy into micro 4/3, you can trade up to a more advanced body and add to, rather than replace the lenses - a saving. Pick a camera with a good electronic viewfinder and ideally with a bright adjustable LCD. Get a compact kit zoom with your camera and resist a temptation to buy additional lenses, until you KNOW what you need. Practice composition, get a feel for how the picture look different with different zoom settings and how the photos differ taking photos close to the ground and above your head. Consider processing your best photos in Lightroom.

I should state at this point, that I normally do not recommend one brand over another. I think all companies offer capable cameras. I therefore scoff at arguments like Nikon is better than Canon or vice versa. However, I consider the price of lenses, weight, selection and wide support for micro 4/3 so compelling that I am braking with my tradition.

3) Serious Hobbyist.
Both Panasonic and Olympus offer or plan to offer micro 4/3 cameras that offer excellent manual control, good EVF and a very good sensor quality. The selection of fast, high quality and relatively inexpensive lenses is impressive for such a young system and more lenses from many companies are rolling in (see above for further discussion). What more do you need to gain true control over how your photos look? Get a ladder of primes to get the best optical quality and the widest apertures (I use a focal distance of approximately 2. For example I would pick lenses with 12mm, 20mm, 45mm etc focal lengths). Get a handle on your exposure and depth of field. Continue to work on your composition and get a good handle on how to photograph with lenses of different focal lengths. Learn to "see what the lens will see". Time to unleash your creativity. Now you really must shoot RAW and learn how to post-process to get most out of your photos. You really need to learn how to color manage, especially if you plan to print.

4) Serious Hobbyist and beyond.
You have a pretty good control over the photos you take, you are fairly competent in post-processing. You know how to optimize the image quality with the equipment you have through careful selection of focal length, aperture, shutter speed. Your lenses and filters are spotless and you use adequate shutter speed or tripod at all times. You know how to improve image quality in software. You recognize that image quality is not everything, and yet you feel that your image quality is not quite up there. You yearn for less noise at high ISO, better dynamic range and perhaps better resolution. You have the big money it takes and a strong back to lug your equipment, including a rather substantive and bulky tripod around. Perhaps you are ready for a full frame DSLR. As you know, Nikon and Canon have the largest line of lenses and good bodies. Take your pick.

Please see my photos at http://mullerpavel.smugmug.com (fewer, better image quality, not updated lately)
or at http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavel_photophile2008/ (all photos)
Reply
#2

Hey Pavel,

I must have missed this, but thanks for writing this up - some very interesting points.

I do agree with regards to M43 vs APS-C in that the image quality is almost on par (with the OM-D anyway). However, one thing to consider as well is price. APS-C systems, are currently being priced very aggressively and I find M43 bodies and lenses tend to be charged at a premium due to being the "in thing" and also the lower sales volumes. Secondly, handling might lend itself better towards the hobbyist who wants an inexpensive kit to learn, cut their teeth, grow into photography. Finally, personal preference might come into play too - some people like something chunky to get their hands around. Big Grin

Anyway, I'm sort of disagreeing with you but then again I'm not - the landscape is definitely changing. Personally if I hadn't already invested so much in APS-C and if I were at the crossroads today, I would probably sway towards M43 as well. Big Grin
Reply
#3

(Sep 18, 2012, 01:19)shuttertalk Wrote:  APS-C systems, are currently being priced very aggressively and I find M43 bodies and lenses tend to be charged at a premium due to being the "in thing" and also the lower sales volumes. Secondly, handling might lend itself better towards the hobbyist who wants an inexpensive kit to learn, cut their teeth, grow into photography. Finally, personal preference might come into play too - some people like something chunky to get their hands around. Big Grin

Julian, I agree that the bodies of low end APS-C cameras are bizarrely cheaper than the high end m43, even though they are costlier to make. However most lenses (other than kit zooms and perhaps old normal lenses) are a lot cheaper for m43. They should be - they are cheaper to make. So in extreme cases you can pay a few hundred $s for lenses which would cost well over a thousand for APS-C/FF versions. That saving kicks in with (most) wide primes and zooms, macros and telephoto zooms. There are some premium lenses, but there are great low cost alternatives. Indeed the quality of lenses at a given price point is outstanding. The big issue is the DOF. Because m43 sensor is smaller than APS-C it takes wider lens to get shallow DOF. If shallow DOF matters to you, you pretty much have to use primes on m43, even if you can get away with zooms on the APS-C cameras. For many, shallow DOF is not all that important however, depending on their subject matter, style and level of development and a kit zoom is often a good way to start.

When it comes to handling, I did not understand which type lends itself better to the hobbyist. OMD-E5 feels like a DSLR when it comes to handling. Some of the lower end of m43 are more like compacts P&S. Most DSLRs handle like DSLRs (you know what I mean), but the lower end DSLRs have some hand-holding features.

Please see my photos at http://mullerpavel.smugmug.com (fewer, better image quality, not updated lately)
or at http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavel_photophile2008/ (all photos)
Reply
#4

Interestingly, Pop Sci has written an article titled "Don't buy a DSLR". This is obviously catered towards the lower end of the spectrum but they claim that the "moment" for DSLRs is past and these days mirrorless counterparts and advanced compacts can fulfill the same role in a smaller and more approachable manner.

http://www.popsci.com/gadgets/article/20...t-buy-dslr
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)