Posts: 54
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation:
0
Posts: 621
Threads: 71
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation:
0
Phlip - She is a beautiful girl and you have done well to capture her great smile. I think you indoor images are a little underexposed. They would benefit from a bit of post processing to brighten them up.
For example:
This is mostly just an autocontrast adjustment in photoshop. I also smoothed the skin a litte (but some clients may be against this):
Original Edited
Let me know if I'm talking giberish, I dont know how familiar you are with post processing methods.
The lighting and contrast on your outdoor images is much better. I think the poses look good and experimentation such as the 'hair flip' (5th image) add interest.
Shane
(This post was last modified: Apr 8, 2007, 01:42 by tiiviitii.)
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Hi Phil,
Beautiful model with gorgeous green eyes...
With your out door pictures I find the light great. I like the idea taking the tree to frame your pictures, what I find distracting is the branch above her head.
With your studio photography I would recomment something like this.
Sorry to take your picture to show my idea.
You can always tell me to remove it, if you don't like it.
In all your pictures I find your composition very centered in the vertical. I would recomend to crop to place the eyes a bit more to the sides...
Too much of portrait photography is your personal approach, and what you want to express. It is still very diffucult to me to put aside my personal liking in a critique comment. However, I want to learn how to critique and give a useful comment. Your work is a great practice to me...
Thanks for sharing, Phil...
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Shane I like your pp here.
I worked mine with curves, and gave me a cooler image that I reduced in oppacity taking part of the warmth of the original.
Like the smooth idea. I cleaned with the healing tool.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 1,184
Threads: 174
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation:
0
I really like the outside shots , in the studio shots , you need some separation from the bg and the model . A background light would help, or even a reflector bouncing back to her hair . This is one thing that i had a hard time with . You might want to bring your subject a little further away from the bg too , maybe 4 feet or so , this will blur out the bg more .
All in all i think you did a good job , and the edits that Shane and Irma did will give you another idea too ..
...... Shawn
Canon 20d and a few cheap lenses ..
It is our job as photographers to show people what they saw but didnt realize they saw it ......
(This post was last modified: Apr 8, 2007, 06:36 by synthetik.)
Posts: 3,291
Threads: 306
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
I like the idea of the tree, but the colour of the tree seems to be too near the young ladies hair colour.
Again PP could change that,
I like the 2nd of the hat shots most. (Smarti calls it the hair flip)
She just looks the most relaxed and not posed in that shot.
These are just my observations not criticisms.
Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
(This post was last modified: Apr 8, 2007, 12:15 by canonkid.)
Posts: 54
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation:
0
Thanks to all of you who offered your comments.
Irma, your comments are always thoughtful as well as useful and I welcome any ideas you have.
Smarti, I agree that the shots are a bit underexposed and lifeless. After staring at over 40-50 images of the same stuff it is good to get someone else's perspective.
Thanks Everybody
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Hey Phlip, well done on getting such nice shots to begin with - the model, poses and expressions are all very beautiful and natural.
I like the work that Shane and Irma have done too - they have really brought out the colours...
Posts: 887
Threads: 103
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Nice shots, and what a lovely looking girl!
As other have mentioned the indoor shos are underexposed,and the outdoor shots are a little flat.
PP would definatly improve these images no doubt, but getting the exposure/lightning right the first time is far more practical.
As for composition i think you'v done a great job, but what really shines thru is the expression on the models face very relaxed and natural, wich means you did a GREAT job.
So for being your first client i'd say you did very WELL.
My personal favourite would be #2
As for the lightning do you have any strobes/speedlights available ?
/Paul L.
Strives to make photos instead of taking them...
Posts: 54
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation:
0
Thanks, Paul. My lighting consists of 2 Sigma 500 DG Supers, one on camera with omnibounce and a slave with softbox attachment, both bounced off the ceiling. In fact the slave flash is the one that broke off the top of my camera last year when I knocked over my tripod with the flash attached to my 20d. Now I strap it to an old video tripod with a necktie I never use anymore=D Anyway, I make do with a mickey mouse set up but I would love to learn more about lighting as well as collect some more equipment.
Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|