Thanks for the comments all.
Irma, that's really interesting that you like #3, and your interpretation is one I had never thought of (I chose that view because I simply liked the way the sky, fence, and grass divided the frame equally with 3 different textures). That was also one of their favourites shots, but I'm not a big fan of that one.
Jules, you are correct. A real typewriter! It still had the $2 price ticket on it from the 2nd-hand shop they bought it from!
Toad, I appreciate your comments and didn't take offence at all. It's valuable to get that kind of honest feedback. Thanks.
I definitely get your point about them looking a over-processed. I was thinking maybe I was getting a bit carried away with the colouring and some of the exposure tweaks on these shots, particularly #1 and #6. I use two supposedly calibrated monitors but I think there is a problem with the calibration on at least one of them at the moment. Lately my photos have been looking good on one screen but over-processed on the other. The trouble is I don't know which screen I should believe, or maybe they are both out of whack? Having said that, shots #2, #3, and #4 have had very little done to them at all. Just a few lightroom tweaks to add a bit more punch. Perhaps a bit too much punch...
I was very interested in your comments about false DoF in #5 and #6. Actually I didn't do any photoshopping to emulate shallow DoF in any of the shots. Those blurry backgrounds are just as they came out of the camera.
Having said that, some of the Channel Mixer and Tone Curve tweaks I made can have a side-effect of making certain colours appear artificially light or dark and can affect the blur quality in OOF areas (such as the strange banding effect that follows the top of the tree-line of #6). This might explain why those areas look out of place.
Either way, thanks for drawing my attention to those areas.
Here is another photo taken the same time as #6 but with less processing. This is as it came out of the camera with only the most basic WB and Tone adjustments in LR. Compare the trees in the background and you can see their outlines look a lot more natural in this shot, although overall the shot is less punchy than the one I posted above.
7.
And finally a few monochrome shots. Because I think the over-processed look in the previous shots was due to my colour/exposure tweaks, I'd be interested to see if you still think these look over-processed. Both of these haven't had much processing done at all apart from the mono conversion, but the lighting in both shots gives them a bit of a surreal look IMHO.
8.
9.