Oct 8, 2008, 13:46
# 1
![[Image: Gaspesie-waterfall-detail-1_DSC8090.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/Gaspesie-waterfall-detail-1_DSC8090.jpg)
#2
![[Image: Gaspesie-waterfall-detail-2_DSC8129.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/Gaspesie-waterfall-detail-2_DSC8129.jpg)
#2
Please see my photos at http://mullerpavel.smugmug.com (fewer, better image quality, not updated lately)
or at http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavel_photophile2008/ (all photos)
 Please see my photos at http://mullerpavel.smugmug.com (fewer, better image quality, not updated lately) or at http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavel_photophile2008/ (all photos) 
Oct 9, 2008, 16:21
Love number 1 I was working on something similar the other day trying different shutter speeds. Number 2 does not work for me too much distraction in the forground.
âLook, I'm not an intellectual - I just take pictures.â - Helmut Newton.
Oct 10, 2008, 05:42
Agree, #1 is simpler. I just like the extra complexity of #2. But that is today. Tomorrow I may feel different. Thanks. Pavel
Please see my photos at http://mullerpavel.smugmug.com (fewer, better image quality, not updated lately) or at http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavel_photophile2008/ (all photos) 
Oct 10, 2008, 16:24
need a slower shutterspeed. crank up the fstop to as high as possible and use ND filters. or shoot late in the evening. it kind of looks like hair.
Oct 10, 2008, 16:31
Thank Rabid, That was the general idea - hair, not cotton candy. I do not find cotton candy appealing. I did use ND filters and 1/2 sec or slower would have given me what you are looking for. This is 1/4 sec. Pavel
Please see my photos at http://mullerpavel.smugmug.com (fewer, better image quality, not updated lately) or at http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavel_photophile2008/ (all photos)
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s) |