Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
The more I learn PS the more I want to work with my pictures, as I used to do with PSP. I know I have to learn more, but I would like to show you my "progress", if any, with this kind of work.
Thanks a lot for your comments.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 2,483
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
I can see the tear; I like the lighting
I am interested to see how it was before PS though, the patchy green background, is interesting (because I keep looking at it), interesting.
Good!
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks Adam.
Here is the original.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 5,739
Threads: 264
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
2
The post processing is quite well donein #1 as far as an artistic interpreation. I also rather like the original for different reasons. Both photos, I feel, should have a bit cropped off the top to place the subject less dead center.
Best
Rob
Posts: 9,325
Threads: 4,038
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation:
5
Irma:
I really like the original better than the high contrast, high satuation version. The effect of the digital treatment is to blur or merge small details which gove the image its texture. The original is very interesting.
Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens.
http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
I also thought about a crop but I didn't know where it could be best. Thanks you very much to all for your comments and adivece.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
I like both versions Irma.. well done! I really like the subtle lighting in the original photo, but the rich colour and artist-like strokes make a fantastic work too.