#Login Register
Digital Photography Forums
More bleach bypass: male street portrait
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


Aug 8, 2010, 16:36 #1
Zig Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:2,123 Threads:352 Joined:Aug 2005 Reputation: 1
Further to my other post about a digital representation of this darkroom/movie technique:
I've been experimenting with this in a variety of convoluted ways, here using a multiplicity of quite different ways in Photoshop to see if i could arrive at roughly the same end.
I'm pretty tired at the mo, so a detailed summary will have to wait for the present. Suffice it to say that one can end up a very far cry from the "base" image!

As an example, here is firstly an entirely uncropped, unadjusted default shot:

[Image: 2252default.jpg]

And here are 2 treatments of the same raw file, each taking a good couple of hours to get to the finished article. My starting-point for both was a low-contrast 16-bit tiff, exported uncropped from Adobe Camera raw into Photoshop. I'll see if I can remember the workflow over the next day or two!

[Image: 2252Banjo_bbpBW_ST.jpg]

[Image: 2252Banjo_MTTbb_ST.jpg]


Aug 8, 2010, 22:02 #2
Irma Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:5,148 Threads:479 Joined:Oct 2004 Reputation: 1
Both in their own style look really nice... I like the crop you did from the original.. Smile

Aug 9, 2010, 16:26 #3
matthew Shuttertalker *****
Status: Offline Posts:3,036 Threads:253 Joined:Jun 2005 Reputation: 3
Hmmm… not so much this time. I think I prefer the second take, but it's feeling a little like zombie bluegrass.
(and for the record, I like bluegrass.)

Aug 9, 2010, 18:48 #4
Don Schaeffer Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:8,997 Threads:3,806 Joined:Sep 2004 Reputation: 4
I like the first of the two croped versions. The second is too harsh.

Aug 9, 2010, 23:52 #5
Zig Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:2,123 Threads:352 Joined:Aug 2005 Reputation: 1
Ta chaps.
Matthew, I do believe you've invented a new musical genre here... Smile
Good point Don; I too was surprised that processing alone could change the mood of the subject as well as the scene...yes, not too flattering I agree.
Funnily enough, what with the comments of you both, that pentangle star near the player's right hand starts to suggest some significance. :/

Aug 10, 2010, 18:14 #6
Toad Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:5,739 Threads:264 Joined:Aug 2004 Reputation: 2
I prefer #1, Zig. The vignette works there, and the face in #2 feels a bit too HDR to me - whereas #1 strikes the right tone, I think.


Aug 10, 2010, 18:23 #7
NT73 Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:3,291 Threads:306 Joined:Jan 2006 Reputation: 0
They both have something going for them. Smile

Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.

Dec 16, 2012, 08:08 #8
Photopro Junior Member **
Status: Offline Posts:28 Threads:3 Joined:Dec 2012 Reputation: 0
The first one still retains some of the "human" look while the second one looks more like a finely crafted wax figure in a historical museum (not necessarily a bad thing). I prefer #1

Dec 17, 2012, 08:07 #9
Don Schaeffer Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:8,997 Threads:3,806 Joined:Sep 2004 Reputation: 4
I think the sign is an important part of the image. Maybe cropping that out was not a good idea.

Dec 17, 2012, 11:45 #10
photokev Member ***
Status: Offline Posts:103 Threads:12 Joined:Dec 2012 Reputation: 1
Love the crop and I think either image is strong by itself, when you do an A _ B comparison though each has it's strength and weaknesses. (There's never a "perfect" image treatment) I like the facial tonalities of the 1st edited image but like the more subtle vignette of the second. The first shot's dark fade makes him look like an amputee.

But, I think if anyone just saw one shot by itself they'd say wow...






Forum Jump:


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies / Views Last Post
30 Replies 3,103 Views
Last Post by WDHewson
Sep 3, 2016, 04:50
0 Replies 1,478 Views
Last Post by Jeffbridge
May 30, 2016, 20:48

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)