#Login Register
Digital Photography Forums
Wildlife - No photography allowed
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


Dec 28, 2005, 04:31 #1
shuttertalk Shuttertalker *******
Status: Offline Posts:9,733 Threads:1,965 Joined:May 2004 Reputation: 6
Hiya all! Just got back from my trip to Phillip Island, where the main attraction for tourists is the Penguin Parade. They've built some seating right up on the beach where the little fairy penguins come at dusk each night, to return to their burrows. It's quite a good experience, just watching the little tackers bob in on the waves, gather in groups and then march inland...

I was quite disappointed though, after bringing my tripod and long zoom lens, to find some large signs saying "no photography outside of the visitor centre". Yes, you read right. No photography period. Not "no flash photography", but rather, "no photography".

I do understand that these are wildlife and it's in very dark conditions - so thousands of flashes going off will probably have some adverse effect on the penguins. But a couple of things - people generally get there about 1 to 1.5 hours before sunset/penguins - and I wanted to get some photos of the sunset and my family, but still no photography means no photography. The other thing is that I was planning on using a tripod and no flash, but no photography means no photography.

I suppose the counter argument is that most people with point and shoots wouldn't know what long exposure means let alone know how to turn their flashes off. And as soon as one person pulls out a camera, everyone else would follow suit. But still, it's quite disappointing when people who know what they're doing get disadvantaged because of the ignorance of others...


Anyway, I did manage to sneak in a few penguin photos, so enjoy:

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
[Image: DSC_2459.JPG]

[Image: DSC_2458.JPG]

[Image: DSC_2461.JPG]


Dec 28, 2005, 07:55 #2
EnglishBob AKA Craig *****
Status: Online Posts:3,340 Threads:199 Joined:Oct 2004 Reputation: 7
IT's probably more to stop people harrassing the penguins by trying to get close to them than the flash issue. There are places around here that don't allow photography during breeding season for the Elephant seals, to discourage people from getting close to them.

Dec 28, 2005, 14:01 #3
shuttertalk Shuttertalker *******
Status: Offline Posts:9,733 Threads:1,965 Joined:May 2004 Reputation: 6
Closeness is not an issue - they have specific areas for people to sit that are roped off so people can't cross onto the beach, and also rangers that are present during the whole time to enforce the rules...

Dec 28, 2005, 22:20 #4
Irma Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:5,148 Threads:479 Joined:Oct 2004 Reputation: 1
I really can imagine how disappointing it was for you.... I can imagine that the use of flash may disturb the penguins, but also I think that allowing to take pictures would affect the sale of souvenirs... Sometimes the profit of those stores helps to maintain the place in good conditions... in such case they should sell permits to take pictures, and give to those people a special area to photograph where they can get a nice picture without disturbing the penguins...

Dec 29, 2005, 00:27 #5
byrt_001 Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:992 Threads:138 Joined:Nov 2004 Reputation: 0
hi

must be one of those studit rules laws of no photography in a national park. you need to have a permit and contact the people in charge

also maybe the penguin get strees out and do not lay eggs. it happens with ostriches...uuhmm diferent birds.

christian

Dec 29, 2005, 02:57 #6
XeoX Member ***
Status: Offline Posts:130 Threads:12 Joined:Dec 2005 Reputation: 0
But was it strickly followed that you'd not take photos of the penguins or was it technically possible to photograph them secretly?


Dec 29, 2005, 03:42 #7
shuttertalk Shuttertalker *******
Status: Offline Posts:9,733 Threads:1,965 Joined:May 2004 Reputation: 6
They had rangers present the whole time, asking people to put their cameras away. I was pulled up for having my PDA out (no videos please) even though it didn't even have a camera on it - I was just reading an ebook to kill the time. A woman 3 rows back pulled her camera out and was told off quicksmart...

I suppose in the darkness one could have pulled out a camera and pulled off some shots sneakily, but I wasn't going to stoop to that level.

Dec 29, 2005, 04:02 #8
XeoX Member ***
Status: Offline Posts:130 Threads:12 Joined:Dec 2005 Reputation: 0
Humn, very odd. But guess they have their own reasons for doing so.

Dec 29, 2005, 08:18 #9
wulinka Posting Freak *****
Status: Offline Posts:1,305 Threads:130 Joined:Dec 2005 Reputation: 0
There were probably people to begin with who wouldn't respect sort of looser rules, you know how people are. When was the last time you watched a movie without someone's cellphone going off?
Sad and annoying as it is, in most cases, superstrict rules and enforcement are a response to some silly people.
I think you got a few great shots there! :-)






Forum Jump:


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies / Views Last Post
0 Replies 1,984 Views
Last Post by Jeffbridge
Jun 7, 2016, 22:45
0 Replies 1,297 Views
Last Post by Jeffbridge
May 30, 2016, 20:48

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)