Mar 30, 2006, 09:28
Spring has come, and I played with B/W conversion again, but am not to sure about the result, any suggestions?
Any comment appreciated!
Uli
Any comment appreciated!
Uli
Mar 30, 2006, 09:28
Spring has come, and I played with B/W conversion again, but am not to sure about the result, any suggestions?
Any comment appreciated! Uli
Mar 30, 2006, 09:59
The whites don't seem to quite "pop" to me, and the blacks don't seem totally black.
Love the image textures and composition though
Mar 30, 2006, 10:24
At first glance it looks like prawn crackers from the takeaway.
I think you should put back a little colour. :/ Lumix LX5. Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Mar 30, 2006, 11:36
Yeah, it's quite far away from black and white. Looks a bit brownish to me.
All in all I think it is a nice artificial shot, though.
Mar 30, 2006, 11:37
I was just playing "spring shots" too............ Here's mine.
"Dont be Daff" Cave canem
Mar 30, 2006, 12:13
Personally I like the tones in your shot. It is the view of this particular flower I don't really care for. I'd like to see a more revealing view.
Mar 30, 2006, 17:50
Rufus, what's your backdrop? It looks fantastic! (although a touch kitschy.... no offense :-))
Mar 30, 2006, 17:54
wulinka Wrote:Rufus, what's your backdrop? It looks fantastic! (although a touch kitschy.... no offense :-))Difference clouds?
Mar 30, 2006, 18:19
I like your flower shot uli and I think it looks good in black and white. I like that you have a lot of detail in your highlights and shadow areas. I even like the brownish tinge.
Canon 350D with Speedlight 580EX flash EFS 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 II, EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 http://www.inspired-images.com.au
Mar 31, 2006, 00:25
hi wulinka
i also like it, the only problem that i have is the background. I like the tones of brown but i think with a diferent background colour would be better. it is just flotting in the black. thanks for sharing your work
Mar 31, 2006, 03:55
The problem I find here is the angle of the picture... I agree with petographer that you need to show more of the flower, specially when the flower is not a commonly known... I mean, if I take just the core of a rose everybody will know it is a rose... but if I take the core of an exotic flower no one will know what it is... I personally thought it was a chili... sorry...
I find that you have nice texture and nothing is blown out... This is something I do care.. now... I don't know if tomorrow I will change my style, but at the moment I do care about not having anything blown out... I love to work with sepia or b&w flowers... color flowers are a lot, b&w flowers are just a few... and beautiful ones fewer... if I may I will give you a link to 1400 pictures of b&w flowers. I am sure you will find inspiration there... Keep trying... A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art. Paul Cezanne
Apr 2, 2006, 20:22
byrt_001 Wrote:i think with a diferent background colour would be better. it is just flotting in the blackWhat do you suggest? brighter, darker? effects? Thanks for everybody's comments so far, and irma, thanks for the link! uli
Apr 3, 2006, 03:43
wulinka Wrote:Rufus, what's your backdrop? It looks fantastic! (although a touch kitschy.... no offense :-))Mr Toad said: "Difference clouds?" No it's hand done, blurry whorlly things. It was easy because the original background was flourescent and behaves like chromakey. Cave canem
Apr 3, 2006, 08:20
Rufus Wrote:Fair enough - it looks quite a bit like difference clouds - hence my mistake. Nice work.wulinka Wrote:Rufus, what's your backdrop? It looks fantastic! (although a touch kitschy.... no offense :-))Mr Toad said: "Difference clouds?"
Apr 3, 2006, 09:32
Mr T, you've made me wonder now. Perhaps I can save loads of effort by investigating these difference clouds? I must look.
Cave canem
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s) |