A Forest and motion blur.
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
I saw somewhere something similar and I wanted to make my own try.
Comments and critiques are very welcome...
Thanks...
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 5,739
Threads: 264
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
2
Wow!! Great concept. I love it.
It reminds me of a movie where the trees are hair on a head.What a great effect.
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks Toad!!
I am very happy you liked the idea.
I have seen lately a lot of work done with up side down trees...I don't really know whether that has a special meaning or not, but I have seen beautiful images. I might work something with this effect and liquify...
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 3,291
Threads: 306
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
A striking photo Irma. My only comment is to make the lines, follow the forked bottom of the tree, on the right foreground.
And the upside down trees are standard in Australia.
Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Posts: 3,036
Threads: 253
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
3
Interesting and creative. Very nice.
matthewpiers.com • @matthewpiers | robertsonphoto.blogspot.com | @thewsreviews • thewsreviews.com
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks NT and Matthew for your comment...
NT the thing is that in the middle of the tree there is a leaf and I didn't want to erase it with the motion blur.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 9,325
Threads: 4,038
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation:
5
It's surrealism--it's gone beyond special effects. Now you are a pioneer.
Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens. http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks Don...
I am very happy you liked it. What I like a lot here is that I have the trees blurred but still you can appreciate some texture. Maybe because of the contrast of light...
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 1,305
Threads: 130
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation:
0
I saw this in your flickr galery and it's admirable
uli
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks Uli...
But I don't have it in flickr... you might have seen it somewhere else?
Most of my flickr contacts don't like image manipulation to this level. They just want to see photographs.
I had planned to open another account in flickr with only my photomanipulations and promote them as such, but I did it in deviantART.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 2,123
Threads: 352
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
1
I really liike this too: lovely tones and helped by the fact that it's a good composition anyway.
All my stuff is here: www.doverow.com
(Just click on the TOP RIGHT buttons to take you to my Image Galleries or Music Rooms!)
My band TRASHVILLE, in which I'm lead guitarist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6mU6qaNx08
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks Zig.. you are right it has some composition and the colors are quite nice too, I think...
However I don't think it would look interesting without this effect. How many pictures of forest we see every day and are so boring. You need to have sunbeams or mist and great light and colors to really make your forest picture stand out.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 2,483
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
tastefully done
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks Adam for your comment...
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|