Posts: 219
Threads: 92
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
0
Bee hovers over a Californian Poppy - Fitzroy, Melbourne
Camera: Canon EOS 350D
* Make: Canon
* Model: Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
* Shutter Speed: 1/640 second
* F Number: F/5.6
* Focal Length: 300 mm
* ISO Speed: 400
* Date Picture Taken: Oct 1, 2005, 11:32:47 AM
Canon EOS 350D Digital Camera , 2gig Scandisk Ultra II CF Card, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens, EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens, EF 28mm f2.8 Lens Wide Angle, Macro 58mm Lens kit (1+ 2+ 4+ 10+), Hoya 58mm PL-CIR Polariser, Optek PT3900 Pro Series Tripod
Kerridwyn's Photography Gallery
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Really, I do like your pics, I do,
But this one wont fit in an English Honey pot!! :o
Cave canem
Posts: 219
Threads: 92
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
0
Apologies for the size, the smaller they get I loose alot of detail and they pizulate, there taken a t a HUGE resolution and this is 33% of the original size
Canon EOS 350D Digital Camera , 2gig Scandisk Ultra II CF Card, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens, EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens, EF 28mm f2.8 Lens Wide Angle, Macro 58mm Lens kit (1+ 2+ 4+ 10+), Hoya 58mm PL-CIR Polariser, Optek PT3900 Pro Series Tripod
Kerridwyn's Photography Gallery
Posts: 3,620
Threads: 235
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
Kerridwyn
Your images are great. Very nice and the detail excellent. In another recent thread I am recommending for people to keep the posted image size to a maximum of 600x800 pixels. http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=3869 As you can see from the poll everyone that has voted agrees. So far this hasn't been made mandatory. My guess as to why it hasn't is because of the possibility of a forum software update or change. So for now, I would like to ask that you please reduce your image sizes accordingly out of respect for the rest of the members viewing your images. You can always add a link for viewing images at full resoloution.
Sit, stay, ok, hold it! Awww, no drooling! :O
My flickr images
Posts: 219
Threads: 92
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
0
Petographer Wrote:Kerridwyn
Your images are great. Very nice and the detail excellent. In another recent thread I am recommending for people to keep the posted image size to a maximum of 600x800 pixels. http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=3869 As you can see from the poll everyone that has voted agrees. So far this hasn't been made mandatory. My guess as to why it hasn't is because of the possibility of a forum software update or change. So for now, I would like to ask that you please reduce your image sizes accordingly out of respect for the rest of the members viewing your images. You can always add a link for viewing images at full resoloution.
I am more then welcome to adhear, however I will need a guinea pig to tet out the reduction on my screen at home, the machine I have has a 17" wide screen so whats small for me is massive for others on low resolutions and also 600x800 on my res may be quite small
Canon EOS 350D Digital Camera , 2gig Scandisk Ultra II CF Card, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens, EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 Lens, EF 28mm f2.8 Lens Wide Angle, Macro 58mm Lens kit (1+ 2+ 4+ 10+), Hoya 58mm PL-CIR Polariser, Optek PT3900 Pro Series Tripod
Kerridwyn's Photography Gallery
Posts: 3,620
Threads: 235
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
Kerridwyn Wrote:Petographer Wrote:Kerridwyn
Your images are great. Very nice and the detail excellent. In another recent thread I am recommending for people to keep the posted image size to a maximum of 600x800 pixels. http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=3869 As you can see from the poll everyone that has voted agrees. So far this hasn't been made mandatory. My guess as to why it hasn't is because of the possibility of a forum software update or change. So for now, I would like to ask that you please reduce your image sizes accordingly out of respect for the rest of the members viewing your images. You can always add a link for viewing images at full resoloution.
I am more then welcome to adhear, however I will need a guinea pig to tet out the reduction on my screen at home, the machine I have has a 17" wide screen so whats small for me is massive for others on low resolutions and also 600x800 on my res may be quite small
Sorry pal. It is what it is. Nothing personal.
Sit, stay, ok, hold it! Awww, no drooling! :O
My flickr images
Posts: 3,694
Threads: 243
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
11
Imagine how small they look for me, I'm running a 19" screen. But to remind me to reduce size I use a photoshop action that reduces to 800 (ish) and adds my signature.
Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|