Posts: 5,739
Threads: 264
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
2
Another key question to ask is:
Is this one of Toad's photos?
Posts: 3,036
Threads: 253
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
3
An interesting article, thanks for the link. I was intrigued to see that resizing or fairly basic tone corrections is enough to defeat the current 'fingerprint' detection techniques. If a photo with a Levels adjustment counts as manipulated, then that's an authenticity standard that film would never be able to meet. It seems like there's no easy answer to the basic question of exactly what constitutes a 'manipulated' image.
matthewpiers.com • @matthewpiers | robertsonphoto.blogspot.com | @thewsreviews • thewsreviews.com
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
Thanks for the link Jules...
It was an interesting reading... I was impressed by the pictures of the woman in different backgrounds... and the man with different color halmet... at the end you don't know what you are looking at when you see these pictures in the news...
What made me laugh a lot was the fainted man with the cap in his arm... so sweet.... fainted but without losing his cap...
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Yeah, my favourites are the green helmet guy, and also that old lady in black that poses at a few scenes...