It's me. Critique, please.
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Guys,
I know it's been ages since I dropped in, but I thought I'd say "hello" and ask for some opinions on my photographic doodles. Whilst waiting to go to a big show, (one of my main jobs), I've been, well.... Doodling.
Comments, please.
Thank you.
R.
Cave canem
Posts: 2,123
Threads: 352
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
1
Hello that dog!
Nicely lit and realised I reckon, and I like the bits of textural interest that elevate the products without being distracting.
I wonder if cropping #2 tighter would help..?..
In the final shot, though carefully lit, I find the light source on the left distracting....and I confess I'm not fond of the folds in the foreground. Hmmm...I realise the blue background brings out the product's identifying colour...but for me the overall "coolness" works against the "happy time"(I wonder if an overexposed white background would be easier and less messing about...?)
Mind you, pretty neat for doodles!
All my stuff is here: www.doverow.com
(Just click on the TOP RIGHT buttons to take you to my Image Galleries or Music Rooms!)
My band TRASHVILLE, in which I'm lead guitarist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6mU6qaNx08
Posts: 3,291
Threads: 306
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
Interesting doodles. The bright light at the bottom of some shots irritates me. On the other hand I get inspiration from some.
You have been away for a long time.
Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Thanks guys!
I have certain issues with some of the images, and wanted your perspectives.
I'm constantly playing with techniques and tricks to see what works best when PP is not used.
Some of the above use a limited amount of PP, but essentially they are "out of the camera" pictures.
Any more thoughts from Shuttertalkers would be appreciated, too!
Cave canem
Posts: 2,123
Threads: 352
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
1
Other than the above(and for the final image), I'd venture overall greater cropping. Do they generally need much addition other than just being evenly-lit products, is my one question? The loupe shot works to give an idea of scale by the inclusion of another object.
All my stuff is here: www.doverow.com
(Just click on the TOP RIGHT buttons to take you to my Image Galleries or Music Rooms!)
My band TRASHVILLE, in which I'm lead guitarist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6mU6qaNx08
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Now that's a difficult one. A product shot doesn't necessarily need a breathing space, but I've been criticized for not allowing "copy space" by those looking at advertising potential.
Additional objects of interest are similar. They may not be required, (or wanted), in a product shot, but may be essential contextual accessories in an advert.
That makes it all more complicated, doesn't it? Yes.
Cave canem
Posts: 2,123
Threads: 352
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
1
Ah of course.
But no, not more complicated, as you'd be shooting to a brief and the biz of copy-space, contextual resonance, etc; would be(er, hopefully) given beforehand.
All my stuff is here: www.doverow.com
(Just click on the TOP RIGHT buttons to take you to my Image Galleries or Music Rooms!)
My band TRASHVILLE, in which I'm lead guitarist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6mU6qaNx08
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
The brief is a huge point here.
One of the most perplexing self challenges, (photographically), is to "shoot something."
Without a brief, or an inspiring thought, the quest for improvement can be a little tedious.
Cave canem
Posts: 2,123
Threads: 352
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
1
For that reason, I'd guess that maybe the "quest" would first be the desire to say something, then the shooting becomes merely the vehicle to do that?
All my stuff is here: www.doverow.com
(Just click on the TOP RIGHT buttons to take you to my Image Galleries or Music Rooms!)
My band TRASHVILLE, in which I'm lead guitarist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6mU6qaNx08
Posts: 9,325
Threads: 4,038
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation:
5
Everything looks so clean and new. I just want to touch it.
Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens. http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Posts: 5,739
Threads: 264
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
2
Looks good, Dog. I don't know much about doing product shots (as anybody who has read my reviews can attest), but these look good to me - clean and detailed. Nice background. One quibble - the brandy bottle looks too close to the bottom of the picture.
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Thank you, guys! That's really cool.
I'm off now (7am Tuesday), to one of my biggest (and longest), jobs of the year, on the UK's south coast. See you later!!
Cave canem
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Nice work Rufus. I really like the bottle shots, especially the brandy one. The coloured smoke really adds class against the dark background.
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Thanks man. Appreciated.
Cave canem
Posts: 52
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation:
0
The black bottle is cool. Also I like the first one, almost professional looking. My only complaint is that the numbers aren't sharp enough. Also, would a completely black background work better.
Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|