Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
They tell us what we cant say, they tell us what we want. They fake school adhievements, they drown the poor, they stop photo's.....................
Even BIBLE quotes are getting banned.
I'm none too happy about the way things are going at all.
Cave canem
Posts: 3,694
Threads: 243
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
11
I haven't read the article but I am wondering how you detect a digital camera at 33 feet?
Posts: 9,325
Threads: 4,038
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation:
5
I can't imagine this becoming a wide-spread problem. It's a flash in the pan (excuse the pun).
Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens.
http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Posts: 2,483
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
I need one for my car (to avoid those police cameras) ahaha
Posts: 2,356
Threads: 349
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Farbeit from me to assist law-breaking, but a slave flash in the car, would almost certainly prevent speed camera detection. :/
Cave canem
Posts: 3,036
Threads: 253
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
3
Rufus Wrote:... a slave flash in the car, would almost certainly prevent speed camera detection.
Wandering off-topic... many years ago, Ontario experimented with photo-radar (radar-triggered cameras to capture license plates) vans for speed enforcement on its highways. Shortly after their launch, our license plates changed to use reflective paint. The government denied that it had anything to do with the photo radar...
We can all imagine what happens when high-powered strobes hit reflective license plates...
(...hmmm... maybe that's all this anti-camera device is? A couple of bicycle reflectors to detect and neutralize a camera's flash?)
matthewpiers.com • @matthewpiers | robertsonphoto.blogspot.com | @thewsreviews • thewsreviews.com
