Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

New camera: 2 megapixel Fuji Finepix 2650
#1

I bought this for fun for $30 from a neighborhood store.

[Image: leavesFUJISM.jpg]


[Image: FallFlowers5FUJISM.jpg]

Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens. http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Reply
#2

Good deal!

And 2MP is all most people need for up to 4x6 prints.

The megapixel wars are ridiculous.

_______________________________________
Everybody got to elevate from the norm!
Reply
#3

Thats what I feel. My DSLR is only 6.1 megapixels.

Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens. http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Reply
#4

Another camera. You thinking of starting a shop? Big Grin

Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Reply
#5

I guess i love cameras, espeically when they are REALLY CHEAP!

Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens. http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Reply
#6

Nice - imaging resource called that camera a good bargain when it cost $200. And while a whole host of things have gotten better/brighter/faster over the past five years, absolute image quality isn't high on the list.

matthewpiers.com • @matthewpiers | robertsonphoto.blogspot.com | @thewsreviews • thewsreviews.com
Reply
#7

absolute image quality isn't high on the list.

Maybe when transistors and chips get even smaller, the mfgrs will be able to rectify that at a price we can afford.
It is really not too long ago that cameras were mainly mechanical, and half the size and weight they are now.
I am thinking of pentax and leica with the leather ever ready cases.
Now it is a not quite ever ready backpack. How long before we get a quality electronic zoom, and do away with all the L quality glass ? Wink

Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Reply
#8

Good for you. I agree. My "obsolete" gear is not obsolete in my house. Smile
I bewail for the anger-ridden thing that has seemed to replace the pleasure of photography on so many forums: pixel-peeping drives blood pressure up. And it is a mere spit ago that we had no autocus points to worry about augmenting the number of...(sorry,...nurse, bring me my slippers and pipeRolleyes)

All my stuff is here: www.doverow.com
(Just click on the TOP RIGHT buttons to take you to my Image Galleries or Music Rooms!)
My band TRASHVILLE, in which I'm lead guitarist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6mU6qaNx08
Reply
#9

Actually the old film cameras were heavy dogs and not ergomically designed. People used to buy special grips so they could hold them. Modern cameras (digital and film) are a lot nicer. This Fuji camera is fat and not especially designed to fit the hands. It is light though.

Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens. http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)