Posts: 5,739
Threads: 264
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
2
I'm liking the last 3 - especially the last one. That 135 seems to be really working for you.
Posts: 2,123
Threads: 352
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
1
I'd agree. There's a "way of seeing" for each lens' focal length, IMO, and you seem to have an eye for the compression of the tele. If I could be so bold though, I'm not personally sure that the post-processing works with the subjects...?
All my stuff is here:
www.doverow.com
(Just click on the TOP RIGHT buttons to take you to my Image Galleries or Music Rooms!)
My band TRASHVILLE, in which I'm lead guitarist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6mU6qaNx08
Posts: 9,325
Threads: 4,038
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation:
5
Thanks Toad and Zig. As far as pp goes, I learn as I go.
Nikon D3100 with Tokina 28-70mm f3.5, (I like to use a Vivitar .43x aux on the 28-70mm Tokina), Nikkor 10.5 mm fisheye, Quanteray 70-300mm f4.5, ProOptic 500 mm f6.3 mirror lens.
http://donschaefferphoto.blogspot.com/