Sensor cleaning revisited
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Hey all, I'm getting a sensor brush to review soon, so I'm looking forward to that, but also nervous at the same time whether I could be doing my camera any harm. Just wondering how everyone goes about cleaning their DSLR sensors (or should I say sensor filter/plate/thingy)? What works best for you? How often do you do it?
Along similar lines - does anyone actually follow the recommendations from the camera manual - i.e. abstaining from self cleaning, and sending your camera into be cleaned by qualified service personnel only?
Posts: 2,483
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
I bought some sensor cleaning things, but so far have only used the sensorsweep - a brush which you charge up by using a blower first. I'm very happy with the results, almost all the disgusting marks are now removed, but a few stubborn ones won't move. Perhaps they may go with a wet cleaning.
I've used it a few times now, first time I did it I was very careful, now I can do it a lot faster - but scared that I might get too confident and break something... haha, but really, it's quite simple.
I do it (dry clean) with the sensor sweep when I see any signs of dust on my photographs
Don't be nervous, you can do it
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
I managed to keep the istD sensor clean mainly with a simple 'hurricane' blower. I did wet clean it a couple of times too - used Digipads and eclipse fluid.
The wet cleaning wasn't anywere near as frightening or difficult as I thought it might be - honestly. I simply mounted the camera on the tripod next to a window, angled it downwards slightly so I could see the surface of the sensor (well the filter that covers the sensor, to be more precise). that meant i could actually see the stubborn specks with the naked eye.
A drop of Eclipse, wipe once each way with a clean pad (use each side only once) and that did the trick no bother. the result was excellent too - bright/clean sensor, dust specks all gone.
Pol
(This post was last modified: Jan 30, 2007, 09:13 by barrok.)
Posts: 3,291
Threads: 306
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
Just in time Pol, as my sensor looks a bit spotty. (well blue sky in shots)
My whoosh brush is a very small one, so I may get the Rocket.
Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Posts: 1,184
Threads: 174
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation:
0
I havent really had to " clean " mine yet . I did get some " dust " on it and just using a " puffer " did the trick . When would/should i get it cleaned ? Just when i see specks or after a bunch of shots ( i am getting there very quick ) ?
........ Shawn
Canon 20d and a few cheap lenses ..
It is our job as photographers to show people what they saw but didnt realize they saw it ......
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
NT73 Wrote:Just in time Pol, as my sensor looks a bit spotty. (well blue sky in shots)
My whoosh brush is a very small one, so I may get the Rocket. That's the one, either that or the 'Hurricane' blower which is available from 7dayshop or warehouse express. The Digipads and Eclipse fluid are available from Warehouse Express.
It's not the actual sensor your wiping anyway. It's the filter in front of the sensor that you're cleaning (low pass filter iirc - I'm not into all that techno babble stuff)
No more thn 1-2 drops of fluid onto the tip of the pad then wipe L-R with one side, turn the pad and wipe R-L with the other side. Then try a test shot and if it's not as clean as you wish just repeat the cleaning proces with a fresh digipad.
Just be sure not to uset he same digipad twice, use a clean pad per clean and a fresh side of the pad for each diection.
BTW - the smaller the aperture, the more the dust specks will show through on the pictures .... so I did my test shots (of a sky) at about f16 ... some of the really pernickity folks do their test shots at f/22.
Pol
(This post was last modified: Jan 31, 2007, 03:00 by barrok.)
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
Banded Drake Wrote:I havent really had to " clean " mine yet . I did get some " dust " on it and just using a " puffer " did the trick . When would/should i get it cleaned ? Just when i see specks or after a bunch of shots ( i am getting there very quick ) ?
........ Shawn Just do it when it becomes too much work and bother to be spotting out the specks with the software (cloning, spotting or whatever method you use when post processing).
When you find you can't get it clean enough with the blower or the marks are too stubborn. Then's the time to think about using the pads and fluid.
I know nothing about all the latest fancy sensor cleaning gizmos. The pads and Eclipse do the job well for me so I never had reason to try any other method.
Pol
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Yay, the review unit came in the mail courtesy of Fedex today!
It's the Arctic Butterfly 724 from VisibleDust.com ...
http://www.visibledust.com/products.php?PID=201
Will post some more when I find some time to do actually use it..
Posts: 2,483
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Woah! You get a review unit!
Then you have to send it back when done?
You should get your sensor very very dirty and see how it goes
Eat cornflakes over it
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Haha, fortunately I think I get to keep it. They probably don't want a used sensor brush back...
Posts: 2,483
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
You get to keep it! how mega-ly cool!
Posts: 3,291
Threads: 306
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
Polly Wrote:NT73 Wrote:Just in time Pol, as my sensor looks a bit spotty. (well blue sky in shots)
My whoosh brush is a very small one, so I may get the Rocket. That's the one, either that or the 'Hurricane' blower which is available from 7dayshop or
Pol Got the Rocket today and a Samsonite bag as well. I will take a couple of shots of it as it is quite neat, for local jobs. The fluid & pads I will get if required.
I remember all the little tips but sometimes forget where to look.
i.e. caravette arm pod with the ball head etc. Trouble is I don't sit in the back with cups of tea.
Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
NT,
I'm not quite sure what you mean?? D'ya mean you were looking for details of the multitripod and ballhead setup I use when using the long lens from the side of the campervan (setup on the passenger side opened window).
If so - I use the 'ErgoRest' multi-tripod with a Manfrotto 222 Grip Action Ball Head. Best offer I know of atm for the Ergorest is about £42 from 7dayshop. Dunno the current price of the 222 Ball head but they're widely available. The Ergorest and 222 tripod head is also reviewed by Andy Rouse on the Warehouse Express site.
Here's the link fort he 7dayshop offer. http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/product_..._id=100940
Hope that's the info you wanted.
Pol
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
Polly Wrote:NT,
Dunno the current price of the 222 Ball head but they're widely available. The Ergorest and 222 tripod head is also reviewed by Andy Rouse on the Warehouse Express site.
Pol The 222 costs £69-95 at Warehouse express. I can't post a link 'cos of the way they designed their website but there's a picci of it HERE - just so you know for sure which one I mean.
Pol
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
..... and a couple of snapshots of the Ergorest + 222 Ballhead set up on the window of the camper. One from the inside, one from the outside ( with the Sigma 170-500 attached)
Polly
(This post was last modified: Feb 3, 2007, 04:58 by barrok.)
Posts: 3,291
Threads: 306
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
No Pol, I was meaning I drive so that would get in the way or I would have to change seats.
I do remember that (Ergorest) and a lot of other things. I was just using that as an example. But thanks anyway.
Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Wow, that's a pretty cool setup Pol!
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Hey all, I've finished the review of the Arctic Butterfly 724 from VisibleDust - would really appreciate if everyone could have a quick squizz and provide any comments or feedback before I release the article into the wild...
http://www.shuttertalk.com/articles/arcticbutterfly
Thanks,
Jules
Posts: 1,184
Threads: 174
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation:
0
I like the reveiew , thanks for letting us take a peak at it .
..... Shawn
Canon 20d and a few cheap lenses ..
It is our job as photographers to show people what they saw but didnt realize they saw it ......
Posts: 3,291
Threads: 306
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
Nice write up Julian.
Lumix LX5.
Canon 350 D.+ 18-55 Kit lens + Tamron 70-300 macro. + Canon 50mm f1.8 + Manfrotto tripod, in bag.
Posts: 2,224
Threads: 76
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
Looks good Julian - perhaps you should revisit the value for money when you compare it to the cost of the other methods on the market.
Cheers,
Chris
Canon stuff.
Posts: 9,731
Threads: 1,965
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
6
Good point Chris... this is exactly the kind of feedback I need before I publish it in earnest.
Thanks everyone for the comments as well...
Posts: 5,148
Threads: 479
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation:
1
I have to say I didn't read it, but just by the pictures I would be interested in buying it... It looks very easy to clean with this brush.
A work of art which did not begin in emotion is not art.
Paul Cezanne
(This post was last modified: Feb 5, 2007, 04:31 by Kerridwyn.)
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
shuttertalk Wrote:Hey all, I've finished the review of the Arctic Butterfly 724 from VisibleDust - would really appreciate if everyone could have a quick squizz and provide any comments or feedback before I release the article into the wild...
http://www.shuttertalk.com/articles/arcticbutterfly
Thanks,
Jules Very good review in my opinion. I've come acrossone or two people who were using them (and liked them) and idly wondered how they worked - so now I know.
I'll be pointing one or two to yer review, Jules.
Pol
Posts: 703
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
shuttertalk Wrote:Wow, that's a pretty cool setup Pol! It's very useful when parked up, especially in the campervan as it's set up quite a bit higher than a tripod - so I can see over hedges etc and further into the distance.
It's not suitable for when the vehicle is moving though, because it's not actually *clamped* to the door/window. It's firm enough for general support but you'd need the proper clamping system for 'on the move' shots.
Pol
Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|