Jan 28, 2012, 20:39
Inset - what they look like complete. 
![[Image: flowerxr.jpg]](http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/346/flowerxr.jpg)
![[Image: flowerxr.jpg]](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/37/flowerxr.jpg/)
Jan 29, 2012, 04:33
Jan 29, 2012, 10:12
Jan 29, 2012, 17:28
Jan 29, 2012, 20:36
Thanks all.
The framed version is a different photo resized, with a tie dyed double selection around it. As Rob hints, to show what the macro was of.
The main is a macro cropped, and the colour is kind of true to life. (on my monitor that is.
)
Both taken with the LX5 last year I think.
I could have had a bit more DOF. The focussing distance is about 1 cm. Can't get that with the Tamron. :/
The framed version is a different photo resized, with a tie dyed double selection around it. As Rob hints, to show what the macro was of.
The main is a macro cropped, and the colour is kind of true to life. (on my monitor that is.
)Both taken with the LX5 last year I think.
I could have had a bit more DOF. The focussing distance is about 1 cm. Can't get that with the Tamron. :/
Jan 30, 2012, 06:25
Well, grand stuff with an LX5 to be sure...and are you sure you could have bettered(in the sense of extended) the depth of field? I confess I'm a little humbled, as I was unaware the little panny could perform this well. Well done mate.
Jan 30, 2012, 14:04
Zig Wrote:..and are you sure you could have bettered(in the sense of extended) the depth of field?I am not sure, but I will have a damn good try when the sun comes out again.
A/V- spot metering - 1/60th - f2.8 - ISO 80
As it opens to f2 and goes down to f8, I am sure now I can better it. Oooh I can't wait.