Thanks so much for your comments

I am very surprised and very happy that you like #2... because I have a lot of them with different colors and shapes... I thought you wouldn't find it interesting...
Sorry I didn't give any comment yesterday setup, settings, etc...
About the setup.
I built it with things I had at home here is the picture... I doubted to post a picture because of the rudimentary of the setup, but the description was very long. I am sure that it will give a good laugh to you all, but I really didn't want to spend money on this until I knew there were some possibilities...
All this to get a constant drop falling in the same place and the right timing to match the one coming up with the one falling down.
Problems I have is that the speed of the droplet is not constant because the dripper gets slower at the time it has less water but as you know it already you just need to refill it to get again the splash.
I will change all my set up and I will replace everything for the ironing table and a more sophisticated dripper made by a bottle and a pastic straw... I will tell you later if it works....
My settings in the camera. My best results so far for the splash and with the available light I have are: f/16, 1/6400sec. ISO200. 180mm macro lens.
To get the droplet like in #2 with 1/2000sec and f/16 is enough.
Shane, I have also read about people spending a lot of money to get similar or much better pictures, I have also seen pictures where people says they only do it with a dropper or a syringe, and I find that difficult to believe.
I think it is an interesting photography specially at this time of the year where you have nothing around here to shoot at. I don't think I would buy any device to take a better picture, because a lot of those photographers are people who know about physics or/and electronics, lots of formulas and mathematics.... in that moment, I know I will kill the fun of taking these pictures, since I don't like/understand physics and mathematics.
