Sep 24, 2004, 13:12
Sep 24, 2004, 14:10
Hmmm,
What is the haze around the buildings?
What is the haze around the buildings?
Sep 24, 2004, 14:40
Hmm you caught me! I tried to light these areas up by applying a soft light layer in Paintshop. Looked ok on my monitor until right now, when I tuned the brightness up to 100%. Oops! Here is the pic again without the bloody layer:
![[Image: 91_EveningSky.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/91_EveningSky.jpg)
I really need to find out more about image enhancement. Ideas as to what to do with this picture are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
![[Image: 91_EveningSky.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/91_EveningSky.jpg)
I really need to find out more about image enhancement. Ideas as to what to do with this picture are greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Sep 24, 2004, 15:18
Nice photo. I saw what you did right away. You just need a little more precision in using your brushes. Try the trick of using the cut-out tool, just lightening the cut-out part, copying the lightened cut-out to the buffer. Then re-pasting it over the original. (Actually I use Photosuite 4 for that. It works much better than Photoshop).
--Don
--Don
Sep 24, 2004, 15:34
I like what you did with the lightening of the buildings - it looks very eery. I agree that a little more precision with the technique is in order - but it is definately the right direction - looks good.
Sep 24, 2004, 15:37
I confess that I went a bit mad with this. Hope you dont mind too much. It's all a bit red uptop now!!!!
![[Image: 5_91_EveningSky.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/5_91_EveningSky.jpg)
![[Image: 5_91_EveningSky.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/5_91_EveningSky.jpg)
Sep 24, 2004, 15:44
...or a somewhat more subtle approach...btw: sorry for messing with your photo unasked...
![[Image: 79_mod.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/79_mod.jpg)
![[Image: 79_mod.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/79_mod.jpg)
Sep 24, 2004, 16:13
Wow! No need for apologies, it looks great! I wouldn't call it "messing" either... 
Thanks, Don and Toad! I will give it another try then - with more precision.

Thanks, Don and Toad! I will give it another try then - with more precision.
Sep 24, 2004, 16:34
You're welcome. It's a great shot.
For the record (Photoshop CS):
- select black area at the bottom of the original photo with magic wand
- feather selection 2 px.
- lighten the selected area with levels to the church level of lightness
- use history brush to "paint" the original black into the trees
- saturate the whole photo about 17%
- unsharpen mask - 20, 3 0
For the record (Photoshop CS):
- select black area at the bottom of the original photo with magic wand
- feather selection 2 px.
- lighten the selected area with levels to the church level of lightness
- use history brush to "paint" the original black into the trees
- saturate the whole photo about 17%
- unsharpen mask - 20, 3 0
Sep 24, 2004, 16:48
I'm not hurt 

Sep 24, 2004, 18:51
The buildings look very Harry Potteresque!
Sep 24, 2004, 19:12
StudioJ Wrote:The buildings look very Harry Potteresque!
That's what I was thinking!
Actually I kinda like the foggy look to the original, though the retouches are very good too.
Sep 24, 2004, 20:18
Hey guerito... I like the shot, and your attempt too... at first it thought it was fog/smoke from the chimney 
But the colour is wonderful - the sky really complements the colour of the buildings.

But the colour is wonderful - the sky really complements the colour of the buildings.