Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - Printable Version
+- DSLR Photography Forum (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Digital Photography Forum (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Main Photography Discussion (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/forum-17.html)
+--- Thread: Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! (/thread-1812.html)
+- DSLR Photography Forum (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Digital Photography Forum (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Main Photography Discussion (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/forum-17.html)
+--- Thread: Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! (/thread-1812.html)
Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - slejhamer - Jan 23, 2005
Okay, not the worst, that dubious distinction goes to the flakey old Stigma 17-35 POS.
But I've been playing with this highly-touted lens for the past week and I find it very disappointing. Autofocus in moderate light is horrible. It does not seem any sharper at f/8 than wide open at f/4 - and that's not especially sharp. And I see purple fringing in high-contrast areas, though this lens was known for NOT doing that.
This must be the most overhyped lens ever. Both my old Canon 28-135 IS and Tamron 28-75 XR Di lenses were sharper at comparable focal lengths.
Sure, I may have a bum copy. But from what I've read on various review boards, there seem to be quite a few bum copies floating around.
This one's going back to the shop, in exchange for the new Tamron 17-35mm.
:x
Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - Petographer - Jan 23, 2005
Noted. I'll be staying away.
Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - Don Schaeffer - Feb 18, 2005
Sounds like a neat lens--too bad it doesn't work.
Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - Toad - Feb 19, 2005
A crappy "L" lens? What's the world coming to?
Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - peter - Feb 19, 2005
wow .. thats gotta suck .. mann theres alot of fanatics around these days
...
Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - slejhamer - Feb 19, 2005
As you may know, I didn't trade it for the Tamron as expected.
Instead I got the new Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC lens, which I'd say optically is at least as good as what I've seen from "good copies" of the 17-40L. The added focal range makes the Sigma a better walk-around lens on an APS-C size sensor, and at f/4 it's really sharp.
People rave about that particular Canon lens, but maybe that's because Canon's wide lenses just aren't that great!
Honestly I've seen some great pics from it, but I've heard quite a large number of problem stories too.
Canon 17-40mm f/4 L is the WORST lens I've owned! - shuttertalk - Feb 20, 2005
Interesting interesting....
No doubt the designers of the Sigma would be at an advantage, as the lens is designed for a digital image sensor, whereas the Canon is designed for real (
) cameras.Perhaps it's not a true apples to apples comparison? But I guess at the end of the day, we're talking digital and you use whatever suits your needs best!