DSLR Photography Forum
It's that dog again!! - Printable Version

+- DSLR Photography Forum (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Digital Photography Forum (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Photo Critique (https://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/forum-26.html)
+--- Thread: It's that dog again!! (/thread-9086.html)



It's that dog again!! - Rufus - Sep 12, 2008

Hello folks.

Can you please look at this, and tell me why no one likes it?
Is it really that bad???

http://i.pbase.com/g3/25/74725/2/102436694.137OiHxX.jpg

Thanks!


It's that dog again!! - matthew - Sep 12, 2008

Well, that's an easy answer—I can't load the photo. It gives a 403/Forbidden error.


It's that dog again!! - Rufus - Sep 12, 2008

rats!!!!!!!!


It's that dog again!! - Rufus - Sep 12, 2008

[Image: 102436694.jpg]




***Edit by KeithAlanK: Added .jpg to the image URL***


It's that dog again!! - Rufus - Sep 12, 2008

Double rats!!!!

I remember I used to have this problem b4. It's simply that I've forgotten how to post! Rolleyes


It's that dog again!! - matthew - Sep 12, 2008

I can't get it to display, either, but clicking on the non-displaying photo does bring it up.


It's that dog again!! - Zig - Sep 12, 2008

It's a nice shot. Maybe the punters' expectations were of girlies!Big Grin


It's that dog again!! - NT73 - Sep 12, 2008

Only for your health Wink


It's that dog again!! - Rufus - Sep 12, 2008

See? This is all I ever get.

No one will say anything about the bl**dy picture! :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:


PLEASE, say something!!


It's that dog again!! - Rufus - Sep 12, 2008

I've never known this b4.

I've posted it here, I've posted it there.......

Is it truly awful? Please talk to me before I go (more) mad! :o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:o:mad::/:o


It's that dog again!! - matthew - Sep 12, 2008

If it helps, I find that the shadow is too dark, and I'm not a fan of the window treatments. Perhaps a thin reflector to fill some of the shadow on the bottle while still leaving the cast shadow dark?


It's that dog again!! - Zig - Sep 12, 2008

I still like it. It's a good shot. Maybe folks are nonplussed by its apparent static(read "easy") lighting, whereas the amount of thoughtfulness about aperture of flash is not immediately apparent. Exposure, focus, DoF, tonal width and differing textures all work.


It's that dog again!! - shuttertalk - Sep 12, 2008

I like the light and shadow on the table, but I agree with Matthew - maybe a bit more backlighting to bring out the outline of the bottle. It's a bit hard to distinguish from the dark backdrop.


It's that dog again!! - Keith Alan - Sep 12, 2008

The bottle looks to me like it's leaning a bit--may be true, may be a lens or lighting effect?
Also--not very sharp text.
Agree about the shadow, and the need for some backlight or background light to provide more separation and get the bottle's outline defined.
The bottom has the edge of something (card stock or table?) visible--oops.

Shots like this are all about the details as much as the overall mood.
It's a great scene and idea (love the faint window grid you have)--it just needs to be executed better.

I look forward to the re-shoot! Cool


It's that dog again!! - Rufus - Sep 13, 2008

Smile

Thank you folks!! Crumbs, I feel better now.
I was getting really paranoid..............................

I'm very grateful for you all pointing out the flaws. Now I can look at the reshoot with a "new" eye.

Aaaahhh.........Much more relaxed now/////////////////// Cool


It's that dog again!! - Zig - Sep 13, 2008

There are no flaws. It is perfect. It is a Platonic Ideal and the very Type of perfection. Ignore everyone, as this is a plot to unhinge your canine mind.

:|

"...Nurse!...."

Rolleyes


It's that dog again!! - EnglishBob - Sep 13, 2008

Couldn't read it yesterday from work, now I can see the image.

As previously said, text is a little soft.

For my eye there is not quite enough separation from the background, needs just a tiny bit more light on the bottle or teh background, either would work.