EdMak Wrote: (Dec 13, 2013, 04:26) -- Again. Ed. -- You see this ones kinda like a blurry eye chart The other you posted nice and crisp that 28-200 is quite a sharp lens

EdMak Wrote: (Dec 12, 2013, 15:59) -- Edited a bit different. Ed. -- Ya that's better Different image though 1/125 F 6.3

EdMak Wrote: (Dec 11, 2013, 17:57) -- Taken with 30 year old, 35mm Tamron 28/200mm Dynax 5D 1/6th @5.6 ISO 400, Tripod used. Ed. -- Yes the 60 is about 25 yrs old as well here is a crop same size...

EdMak Wrote: (Dec 11, 2013, 17:57) -- Taken with 30 year old, 35mm Tamron 28/200mm Dynax 5D 1/6th @5.6 ISO 400, Tripod used. Ed. -- Still looks good Yes with a good zoom and tripod you can get so...

Thanks for the info and photos their great I'd forgot about Agfa

PhotoPlay Wrote: (Dec 10, 2013, 17:00) -- do you have any image with this lens Nikon 60 2.8 Micro you have? Wondering how it goes in comparison with the Tamron 90 mm. -- Here is a couple I shot for ...

LOL No I've got a big truck to carry it around I should have looked at a few other new members posts The other forums I belong to want you to list your gear maybe I shouldn't have

As you can see by my user I shoot with Nikon I live in Saskatchewan Canada My passion is outdoor photography, I also shoot a little studio as well My gear DX Nikon D300s Nikon 17-55 Nikon 1...

Well it's been awhile since I've shot with film,so I started this thread for some info Anyone hear shooting with film be it B&W or negative or positive film If you are give me some insight in brand ...