Jun 25, 2013, 08:44
Ohh I see. As I compared the HDR of photomatix from other HDR software I would agree with you. Photomatix is great for HDR.
I have too many questions vlad hope you don't mind:
Which comes first? Stitching your photo to become panorama then merge it to HDR
Or Merge your photo in HDR then stich it?
What I do is I merge it to HDR using photomattix then stich the photo to become panorama. Or I'm doing it wrong? I never get the chance to do stiching the photos first then merging it to HDR.
When using Photomatix do you usually adjust it to your likings or have a preffered AUTO adjustments?
What is your recommended pixel size output of a panorama? and Why?
First batch of questions will add more after this, hope you don't mind
Thanks Vlad in advance
I have too many questions vlad hope you don't mind:
Which comes first? Stitching your photo to become panorama then merge it to HDR
Or Merge your photo in HDR then stich it?
What I do is I merge it to HDR using photomattix then stich the photo to become panorama. Or I'm doing it wrong? I never get the chance to do stiching the photos first then merging it to HDR.
When using Photomatix do you usually adjust it to your likings or have a preffered AUTO adjustments?
What is your recommended pixel size output of a panorama? and Why?
First batch of questions will add more after this, hope you don't mind
Thanks Vlad in advance
PhotoPlay Photography
What we are is God's gift to us. What we become is our gift to God.
~Eleanor Powell