Nov 17, 2014, 06:33
It seems to me that the point here is about photo quality.
The advantages of moving from APS-C to Full-Frame are not only improved sharpness (due to less enlargement required for a particular picture size), but also include reduced noise (giving improved low-light performance), and shorter depth of field of lenses (giving greater control of background blur and subject separation). These advantages should help to give better quality photos in some scenarios.
Whether those higher quality photos are any good depends on the vision, creativity and skills of the photographer.
However, I would suggest that one should always aim high in regard to both aspects - obtain the best gear that one can afford, and keep learning and practising to develop ones artistry.
Cheers.
Philip
The advantages of moving from APS-C to Full-Frame are not only improved sharpness (due to less enlargement required for a particular picture size), but also include reduced noise (giving improved low-light performance), and shorter depth of field of lenses (giving greater control of background blur and subject separation). These advantages should help to give better quality photos in some scenarios.
Whether those higher quality photos are any good depends on the vision, creativity and skills of the photographer.
However, I would suggest that one should always aim high in regard to both aspects - obtain the best gear that one can afford, and keep learning and practising to develop ones artistry.
Cheers.
Philip