Jul 12, 2012, 04:14
I played with the camera. Nice and sexy and can perform well, but the lens obscures a big chunk of the view in optical viewfinder (for me it is a big deal - how do you compose? Distracting too). These days there are many competent mirrorless cameras. Using them with a single lens in place gets you much of the same experience (some may match the image quality) and yet you still have an option of changing lenses. Poor performance of standard RAW converters would certainly affect workflow, even if in camera raw conversion is good. Not a camera I would pick, despite a great deal of sex appeal.
Please see my photos at http://mullerpavel.smugmug.com (fewer, better image quality, not updated lately)
or at http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavel_photophile2008/ (all photos)