Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Depth of field
#16

slejhamer Wrote:I assume you really mean "shallow" DOF. Great DOF would imply the entire image appears sharp, foreground to background.
Sorry, yes, I meant 'shallow' -- well, actually I think I meant that I have great DoF flexibility.

both taken at f/2.8@12.1mm (actual) ~70mm (35mm-equiv) -- the key to these two is the distance to the focused subject, not the focal length.
[Image: P1000297_rz800.jpg]

[Image: P1000224_rz800.jpg]

<><
Camera: Panasonic Lumix FZ10
Image Management/Editing:ArcSoft PhotoBase4
Advanced Image Editing: Adobe PhotoShop 7
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Depth of field - by Russt - Feb 28, 2005, 13:53
Depth of field - by jericho - Feb 28, 2005, 14:14
Depth of field - by teddyfingers - Feb 28, 2005, 14:51
Depth of field - by shuttertalk - Feb 28, 2005, 17:04
Depth of field - by byrt_001 - Feb 28, 2005, 17:32
Depth of field - by Russt - Mar 1, 2005, 01:44
Depth of field - by Irma - Mar 1, 2005, 02:53
Depth of field - by Russt - Mar 1, 2005, 04:06
Depth of field - by shuttertalk - Mar 1, 2005, 04:33
Depth of field - by njs - Mar 2, 2005, 05:58
Depth of field - by Cailean - Mar 3, 2005, 06:01
Depth of field - by slejhamer - Mar 3, 2005, 07:25
Depth of field - by teddyfingers - Mar 3, 2005, 10:25
Depth of field - by teddyfingers - Mar 3, 2005, 10:27
Depth of field - by slejhamer - Mar 3, 2005, 11:50
Depth of field - by Cailean - Mar 3, 2005, 16:55
Depth of field - by shuttertalk - Mar 3, 2005, 17:44

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
Last Post by derbyshirephoto
Oct 24, 2015, 06:23

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)