Dec 19, 2005, 07:19
hmmm, maybe I shouldn't be talking because I haven't tried either of these methods, but to me , the results of different approaches simple look very different from each other.
obviously, the technical quality of a shot like Pauls Nikkor fly is excellent, and it is a very appealing picture.
but then the very shallow DOF with the reversed 50mm adds a special feature to a picture, can be a challenge, but the results look terrific! i like a somewhat abstract approach to photography and how often a picture is a piece of art much rather then document.
I am NOT judging and love Pauls picture, just think that in there is a lot more to a side by side comparison of these pictures then technical quality.
ALL lovely pictures, hope I can catch up soon :-)
uli
obviously, the technical quality of a shot like Pauls Nikkor fly is excellent, and it is a very appealing picture.
but then the very shallow DOF with the reversed 50mm adds a special feature to a picture, can be a challenge, but the results look terrific! i like a somewhat abstract approach to photography and how often a picture is a piece of art much rather then document.
I am NOT judging and love Pauls picture, just think that in there is a lot more to a side by side comparison of these pictures then technical quality.
ALL lovely pictures, hope I can catch up soon :-)
uli